How does prescriptive doctrine differ from descriptive doctrine?

Prescriptive doctrine refers to guidelines or frameworks that are meant to be followed closely and provide clear "how-to" instructions for processes and decision-making. In this sense, prescriptive doctrine sets specific expectations and standards that must be adhered to, ensuring uniformity and compliance. This characteristic implies that strict adherence is necessary to achieve the intended objectives and maintain operational effectiveness.

On the other hand, descriptive doctrine encapsulates the practices and procedures that are derived from observations of successful experiences and outcomes. It is more flexible and allows for interpretation and judgment based on context and circumstances. Descriptive doctrine is useful in providing insights about what has worked in the past and can serve as a guide, rather than an obligatory set of rules.

The correct choice reflects this fundamental distinction, emphasizing that prescriptive doctrine demands adherence to specific practices while descriptive doctrine permits discretion and adaptability, thereby allowing practitioners to exercise judgment in applying its principles.