Which command structure allows for each nation to retain control over their forces while cooperating?

The parallel command structure is designed to enable multiple nations to cooperate in military operations while allowing each nation to maintain control over its own forces or units. In this type of command arrangement, forces from different nations operate alongside one another, and each nation retains operational authority over its own troops. This structure emphasizes collaboration and coordination among the nations involved, ensuring that while they work towards common objectives, national sovereignty and command authority are preserved.

In contrast, integrated command structures typically involve a more unified command where forces may be merged under a single authority, which can limit individual nations’ control over their assets. Networked command structures focus on enhancing communication and information-sharing among participating entities but do not inherently solve the issue of national control. Lead Nation command structures assign one nation the primary responsibility for command over the coalition, which may lead to uneven control among the participating forces.

Thus, the parallel command structure stands out as the option that best aligns with the need for both cooperation and national autonomy.