Which level of command is most likely to provide tactical input to operational assessments?

The operational level of command is most likely to provide tactical input to operational assessments because it serves as the bridge between the strategic and tactical levels. This level focuses on planning and conducting campaigns and major operations, and it is responsible for translating the strategic objectives set by the higher command into specific operational plans that can be executed by tactical units.

Tactical input encompasses the firsthand experiences and insights from ground-level operations, which the operational level incorporates to assess how well these operations meet the strategic goals. By analyzing the performance and outcomes of tactical engagements, the operational command can adjust its assessments and refine future strategies, ensuring alignment with broader objectives.

Tactical units directly execute missions based on operational plans, but they typically do not assess operations at the broader operational level. Meanwhile, strategic level commands focus on long-term goals and overarching policy decisions rather than the immediate operational details. Joint level commands may coordinate across different branches of the military but still operate primarily within a strategic or operational context rather than providing direct tactical input. Hence, the operational level emerges as the most appropriate choice for delivering tactical insights to inform overall operational assessments.